Mindmatch feedback Angelo Vitor Dallecrode Gomes

About this report

The purpose of this report is to document the result of these assessments in a structured way, in order to assist in your reflection and self-knowledge process.

The best way to use this report is to reflect on the results, in order to think about how your actions in your daily life are related to the features found and your general profile. The profile should be used to open possibilities, generating insights that improve your self-knowledge, rather than fixing them by focusing only on the results.

You can further investigate and use the elements provided by this report as a basis. Ask other people and compare with feedbacks previously received.

But remember that the best way to carry out these actions is with an open mind to seek development, avoiding defensive behaviors.

Logically, the process has limitations. First of all, it is not entirely inclusive. In other words, although several studies point these features as central, there is no way to map all the features that can be useful in all situations. More than that, the process is not meant to replace specific job-related assessments. That is, it does not work as a performance assessment, only as a profile mapping.

Finally, take advantage of this report to look for similarities with your normal behaviors and see it as an opportunity to analyze yourself based on a standardized process conducted in an impartial manner by third parties, and not as an attack or criticism of who you are.

What is observed

In order to make the analysis of the environment and the test series of the person compatible, comparable and interpretable, Mindsight transforms the results of all assessments into 16 attributes.

The attributes were created using a personality frame called Big Five. Big Five is a personality frame considered universal. Among organizational psychologists, it is a consensus in terms of effectiveness of assessment. Based on it, several studies and meta-studies were sought, focusing especially on general potential, leadership potential, psychometric methods, selection and others specific to each attribute or group of attributes (such as cognitive skills, interpersonal skills, need for achievement, among others) in order to seek a nomenclature that made more sense, thus creating a mixed frame of personality and skill.

Despite the broader classifications and the combination of 16 attributes, the best way to read the profile is to combine all of them in an integrated design. In other words, what does it mean being a person with high initiative, influence and risk taking? Try to understand the profile this way, and not just by maximizing specific points.